Comments on: What Happened to the Canaanites? https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/ Fri, 30 May 2025 16:54:13 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1 By: jason https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/#comment-2000391616 Wed, 03 Jan 2024 22:24:28 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-2000391616 In reply to Bones.

How does that relate to the non-Middle Eastern Jews the Rothshilds shipped in to colonize the area starting in the 1800s?

]]>
By: jason https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-2000391612 Wed, 03 Jan 2024 22:11:49 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-2000391612 In reply to Arthur Rametsi.

It seems that you are copying and pasting a view of race which did exist during the time you are talking about

]]>
By: Harry Shamir https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/#comment-2000302060 Sat, 17 Jun 2023 16:04:12 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-2000302060 Of interest is the proximity or difference between Cna’anite DNA and Jewish populations today. The question is based on the Cna’anite slaves in Egypt pre Exodus, that under Lewite leadership returned to motherland and tribal domains. The descendents of the Patriarchs must have been relatively few, but they too would have had the same DNA as the C’s, thus indistinguishable from the rest. After all they were Aramean, that is northern C’s. I postulate the Levites (Lewites) were actually a Luwite contingent (from Luw, southeast Anatolia), imported to serve as the guard of the Minoan community in Egypt, then left to fend upon dissolution of the Minoan empire. DNA research could answer these questions.

]]>
By: Lion https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-15276 Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:17:41 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-15276 Caanan was a descendant of Ham and his descendants are Caananites.
Abram was a descendant of Shem and jouneyed to Caanan, his descents went Egypt and exodet from there to Canan, where they were known as Yisralites
Japhet was brother to Ham and Shem , all are sons of Noa that came through the Flood.

]]>
By: Lawrence Silverman https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-14828 Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:15:17 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14828 There is a problem with all of the articles relating the recent dna analysis of Lebanese and its relevance to the story of the conflict between the ancient Israelitses and Canaanites in the Bible. Ancient Canaan encompassed the whole of the Levant between Asia Minor and Egypt and all the inhabitants called themselves Canaanite (kn’ni). But the Bible story relates only the southern half of Canaan, called “Palestine” by the Greeks but not the natives, where Israel and Judah were located. It has nothing to say about the northern half, called “Phoenicia” by the Greeks but not the natives, which is roughly modern Lebanon. To the extent that it the Bible has anything to say or indicates much knowledge of northern Canaan, its inhabitants are not seen as enemies to be exterminated. On the contrary, the Canaanite ruler of Tyre, Hiram, is an ally of Soloman who helped in the building of the Temple. So the fact that they were not exterminated by the Israelites tells us nothing. More to the point is the genetic evidence that present-day Jews, like present-day Palestinians, are descended from the previous inhabitants of “Palestine” – that is, Canaanites. The “Children of Israel” were in fact Canaanites who for some reason wished to radically differentiate themselves from their own ancestors and did so by calling themselves Hebrews who originated elsewhere and claiming to have been brought out of Egypt by their god, IHWH, and conquered the land he promised them. The Hebrews were most likely themselves Canaanites, but nomadic pastoralists rather than settled farmers or townspeople who regarded them rather as nomadic Gypsies and Travellers are now regarded. It seems likely that this was their way of establishing themselves as a nation, separate from (and superior to) all others, bolstered by their adoption of a new religion profoundly different from that of their Canaanite ancestors.

]]>
By: Jeff https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-14791 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:17:45 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14791 Why is my Sept. 3 comment still “awaiting moderation” on Sept. 5?

]]>
By: Jeff https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-14790 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 14:16:58 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14790 There are actually people in 2018 who think human races are descended from the sons of Noah?? Come on, this “Arthur” must be an atheist who wrote this post to make religious people look like idiots!

]]>
By: S. Lucy https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-14776 Mon, 03 Sep 2018 15:38:27 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14776 To make it explicit, those we call Phoenician are identical to those we call Canaanites, we have no real idea what they called themselves.

]]>
By: Renee https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/#comment-14650 Fri, 10 Aug 2018 20:39:54 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14650 The Bible doesnt refer to race as we do now, this is information that we applied to the text to promote a narrative that was not true. Also, race doesnt exist until many years after the death of Christ! The just proves there’s some propaganda that many people have to unlearn.

]]>
By: Arthur Rametsi https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/news/what-happened-to-the-canaanites/comment-page-2/#comment-14035 Tue, 17 Apr 2018 11:42:21 +0000 https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/?p=48308#comment-14035 Cannanites were not semitic people as your article says. Remember Canaan is the son of Ham, not Shem. Semitic people emanate from the lineage of Shem and not Ham. Canaanites are what we refer to as Hamites. Ham had 4 sons Mizraim (Egyptians), Phut (Lybians), Cush (Ethiopia) and Canaan (Original inhabitants of the land of Israel). The Zondervan Bible Dictionary tells us that Ham was the progenitor of Black people but not the Negros. Therefore all Ham’s lineage is traced through his 4 sons who are all Black people.

The reason why the Bible Dictionary differentiates between the Hamites and the Negroes is because they are Shemites from the line of Shem. Yes both groups are Black people but with a different progenitor.

The reason why you find a mixed race of people in Egypt and in all other countries of the sons of Ham today is because one of the policies of Alexandra the Greek after he conquers a country, he would flood that country with his own people, the Romans in order to enforce racial intermingling. I am sure in his mind, he was eradicating the original Black inhabitants of such countries. So that when you look at it independently, you begin to think about this as genocide.

The Shemites/Hebrews/Israelites eventually took over the land of Canaan. The land of the son of Ham called Canaan. In this case it was one race of black people taking the land of another race of black people. And eventually a race of white people Eastern European Khazars, took over the land of the Shemites and under false pretenses called themselves Shematic/Jewish/Israeli. The reason why they do not call themselves Israelites is because they are not the descendants of Abraham. They just stole that identity from the real Shemites.

]]>