So finally realize THE CHRISTIAN FAITH is a lie

MichaelDooley did not err on points 1 and 2. You are referring to Mark 7 where Jesus is specifically addressing a group of Pharisees who are criticizing Jesus’ disciples, and Jesus is dealing with the inconsistent application of their religious theory in the real world, as it pertains to the law written in Holy scripture.

Walter W. Wessel explains it this way, “So the very purpose for which the commandment was given was set aside by the tradition. This is what is meant by “nullifying” (akyrountes) the word of God (v. 13).

Walter W. Wessel, “Mark,” in The Expositor’s Bible Commentary: Matthew, Mark, Luke, ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 8 (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1984), 679.

As one who has studied the Bible a long time, I find it strange that people think that Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 are in any way contradictory or indicate that the Genesis account of creation is nothing more than a collection of myths. Chapter 2 simply focuses on a particular aspect of creation – the creation of humanity. One might call it “Creation: Lesson 2.” Why should we be surprised that the book (Bible) purporting to describe the God to be worshipped by humans would begin with a general description of how the universe came to exist, then move to focus on humanity, the species with whom the Creator intended a true fellowship and through which He would make Himself known to His creation?

To act as though it is not to be taken as historically true for it is nothing more than a description suitable for cave-dwellers assumes that God was not involved in the production of the Bible. Even if the original hearers were not scientifically literate, God could easily have informed them of an eons-long process of evolution culminating in man.

Also, whether or not Moses was the original author of the two accounts is of little significance, seeing that he is said to be the one inspired by God to include both accounts within the canon of Scripture. It is not as though no one knew how the universe came into existence before Moses showed up. But of the various accounts of creation extant in Moses’ day, the biblical account is the one God inspired him to include in God’s authoritative account of truth.

Moses did not write both Genesis Chapter 1 and 2, the two creation narratives. The fact is that the two accounts originate from different locals, one from what is now northern Israel and the other southern Israel.

Amen. The creation story is 100% scientifically and historically correct, and WAY ahead of it’s time. These so called “scholars” need to go back to school!

True. These “scholars” are woefully inept and behind the times. Just satan trying to deceive.

Amen. Well said.

Yep. Genesis is 100% scientifically and historically correct. WAY AHEAD of it’s time.

No thanks. Although the Bible is not a science book, it’s creation narrative is 100% scientifically correct and WAY ahead of it’s time. For example, there was an ambient form of light in the universe BEFORE the stars were created. We didn’t know this until recently, when light emitting ion particles were discovered to be much older than the stars. So the creation timeline where there was light the first day, and the stars created on the fourth, is scientifically correct. There was no way Moses could have known this. Even Job, one of the oldest books of the Bible, declares that God “hung the earth on nothing,” (suspended the earth in space). You really need to go back to the research drawing board. The Bible was quite obviously inspired. It had to be to contain information that we ourselves didn’t have until recently, and be 100% scientifically correct.

Keep your website and “scholar’s” research. The true authority is and always will be the Holy inspired Word of God: The BIBLE.

AMEN! Although the Bible is not a science book, it’s creation narrative is 100% scientifically accurate, and WAY ahead of it’s time. No way Moses could have known that a source of ambient light was present in the universe BEFORE the starts were created. Yet clearly he stated there was light on the first day, and the sun and stars were not created until the 4th. This is not something anyone could have known back then unless they were INSPIRED. And there is much more than that proving the Creation story is scientifically true. I totally agree with all your assessments.